Blood-Sucking Mites vs. Mosquitoes in Chameleons

Blood-Sucking Mites

Blood-sucking mites in chameleons represent a fascinating but often overlooked dimension of reptile parasitology. These mites, belonging primarily to families such as Dermanyssidae and Macronyssidae, feed on lymph and blood, producing localized irritation and mild necrosis but not transmitting pathogens. Their activity is restricted to hematophagy, and they do not inject anticoagulants or anesthetics. This sharply contrasts with mosquitoes, which are established vectors of Plasmodium species and filarial worms, both capable of infecting reptiles as incidental hosts (Dhiman and Singh, 2024; PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2011).

Mite Pockets Phenomenon

Chameleons possess specialized invaginations known as mite pockets, located in the axilla, groin, and neck. These structures concentrate mites in defined areas, reducing systemic harm to vital tissues. Arnold (1986) first described mite pockets in lizards, suggesting they function as a damage-amelioration adaptation. Salvador, Veiga, and Civantos (1999) experimentally confirmed their protective role, while Reed (2014) argued that mite pockets represent an evolutionary compromise between host and parasite. Tolley and Herrel (2013) emphasize that mite pockets are consistently observed in chameleons, reinforcing their adaptive significance.

Pathology of Mite Infestation

Mite bites are small and often inconspicuous, with discoloration restricted to the immediate vicinity of the bite. Because mites are much smaller than mosquitoes and do not chemically treat the bite site, lesions are subtle and sometimes overlooked (Arnold, 1986; Salvador et al., 1999). In contrast, mosquito bites produce larger necrotic lesions and black-colored markings due to tissue trauma and the injection of anticoagulatory and anesthetic substances. Garcia et al. (2023) documented mosquito-induced color changes in chameleon skin, noting that these lesions are persistent and melanized. Due to their size the damage of the host skin is more extensive than mite bites.

Ecology of Mite Infestation

Mite prevalence in chameleons is influenced by humidity, host density, and geographic distribution. Tolley and Herrel (2013) highlight that chameleons in Madagascar and East Africa are frequently parasitized, particularly in humid microhabitats. Observations during the rainy season of 2026 in the Andasibe region confirmed mite infestations in several species, including Calumma malthe, Calumma gastrotaenia, Calumma roaloko, Calumma fallax, Calumma hofreiteri, Calumma pinocchio, Calumma cristifer, and Calumma brevicorne. These findings reinforce the ecological association between mite abundance and environmental moisture.

Comparative Parasitology: Mites vs. Mosquitoes

Mosquitoes not only inflict greater tissue damage but also transmit serious diseases such as filariasis and malaria (Dhiman and Singh, 2024; PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2011). Their bites leave conspicuous black marks due to necrosis and pigment deposition. Mites, by contrast, feed discreetly, leaving only faint or inconspicuous marks, and their pathology is mitigated by host adaptations such as mite pockets. The difference reflects both parasite biology and host evolutionary strategies: mosquitoes are vectors of pathogens, while mites are restricted to hematophagy without transmission.

---

References (Alphabetical Order, Correct Format)

Arnold, E. N. (1986). Mite pockets of lizards: A possible means of reducing damage by ectoparasites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 29: 1–21.

Dhiman, R. C., and Singh, P. (2024). Mosquitoes as disease vectors and underlying factors for transmission. Springer Nature, Cham.

Garcia, P., Diaz Jr., R. E., Anderson, C. V., Andrianjafy, T. M., de Beer, L., Edmonds, D. A., and Carney, R. M. (2023). Mosquito bite-induced color change in chameleon skin. Herpetological Review 54: 353–358.

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases (2011). Filarial worms reduce Plasmodium infectivity in mosquitoes. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 5: e1256.

Reed, J. C. (2014). Analysis of the function and evolution of mite pockets in lizards. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 192pp.

Salvador, A., Veiga, J. P., and Civantos, E. (1999). Do skin pockets of lizards reduce the deleterious effects of ectoparasites? An experimental study with Psammodromus algirus. Herpetologica 55: 1–7.

Tolley, K. A., and Herrel, A. (eds.) (2013). The Biology of Chameleons. University of California Press, Berkeley. 275pp.